Franklin of Georgia, proposed 3 Bills, all of which are already Constitutionally protected
Rights of the People. House Bill #7 is the "Right To Travel Act"; House Bill #21 is the exclusive use of gold and silver in the payment of debts, of which, the Constitution
states that money is gold and silver; and lastly,
House Bill #11, to repeal the authority of the governor to issue mandatory vaccine orders, of which,
it is one's Right of choice, not to be forced to take vaccinations. .
It is important to note that if the Right to Travel Act is not passed in Georgia, or in
any other State, this does not mean one does not have the Right To Travel. It is a Right, not an Act. A right
bestowed to you from the moment of birth – a Birth Right. In fact it really is a mute point, and we especially
want people to recognize that if it is already a Right, and is constitutionally secured, as Senator Franklin abides, then
it appears Senator Franklin is exposing that the States have been violating the Peoples substantive Rights.
Keep in mind the only reason Governments are in place is to secure the Rights of the People and for no other reason. Senator Franklin may get guff
from his constituents, but his mind and soul ought rest well, that he is not participating in the corruption of his fiduciary
duties as a Public Servant.
to Travel; The Right to Mode of Conveyance; The Right to Locomotion are all absolute rights, and the Police can not make void the exercise of rights. State v. Armstead, 60 s. 778, 779, and 781:
The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the public and Natural Beings cannot
be rightfully deprived. Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago 337 Illinois 200, 169 NE 22, ALR, Ligare v. Chicago 139 ILL. 46,
28 HE 934, Boone v. Clark 214 SW 607, 25 AM jur (1st), Highways, sec. 163:
CBS news in Georgia posted
Senator Franklins' intent, and of course, on the live news reporting they only showed comments
from people who thought it was 'crazy'. These were people who absolutely don't know what their rights are (which unfortunately
are most, due to the dumb-down educational guidance, and lack of civilized principles). Not one recognized their Right
to Travel, or maybe CBS news simply didn't show the viewers who did speak up for their secured Rights. It matters not
because the 'cat is out of the bag', ‘pandora's box is open’, and has been for a while, which is probably
why Senator Franklin has proposed these Bills. After all, it is the will of the people, as in "We The People",
that have forced many to fess-up. Governments are not in place to dictate to the People, the People dictate to the governments.
For those who may think that there is some ‘new’ rule, statute or ordinance, they would be wise to read Article
VI of the Supreme Law of the Land—the Constitution, wherein it clearly exclaims that if any state makes a rule, ordinance,
statute, etc., that violates the Rights secured in the Constitution, it simply has no standing. Then one may be able to overstand why the following stare
decisis case law, which applies to all of the states, was established:
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making
or legislation, which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125:
For those who may be thinking that
in fact there can be laws established by the State, they must refer to the Constitution
Article I, section 10(1), wherein States are prohibited from making Treaty Agreements. This section of the Constitution
also covers the issue regarding gold and silver, wherein it states they cannot make anything but gold and silver coin as tender in payment of
debts. Any 'new' Laws are made in a collective parliamentary manner, by Sovereigns of the land — the Nationals,
and who are they? Where are they? Certainly they are not modern Europeans who came here as colonist, because this
is not their land, they are not sovereigns to it.
Certainly the Nationals are not the public servants. Just as certainly, they are not people
who have been branded Indian (the first brand), as this is not India. They are Moors (the original navigators of the
seas and the entire planet), who are, and who’s descendants are, aboriginal and indigenous to the land, and who
authorized the Supreme Law of the Land, based on Divine / Supreme principles. They established government and taught
the modern Europeans, by bringing them into the Constitutional Fold of government and established ancient divine principles
of civilization for civilized people, which were embodied in, and adopted as, the Constitution for the United States
of America. Oath bound obligations were, and are, taken to it, as the Supreme Law of this land. This
being done, and still being done for the purpose of creating a more perfect union, amongst other concerns (read the preamble).
All public servants, officials and governments are to follow said supreme law of the land, no matter what 'state', which
begins with a 'state of mind', they may establish. The law of the land, is the law of the land.
The Federal constitution was to bring the states together to follow established guidelines. That brings us full circle back to the Constitution and the obvious
violations being made by those who took an Oath and who have a fiduciary duty to uphold it. Who, and where are
the law enforcers? - the Bailiffs, the Beys.
All encompassing, as Rights go, is the Right to be left alone, providing you do not violate
anyone else's Right to the same, then you would have made either a civil or a criminal infraction. With continued focus
and study, the people might obtain a quiet and peaceable mental revolution as they begin standing up for their Rights, by
first knowing them, and then exercising them. You do not practice a Right, you exercise it, and you do not ask permission
to exercise it, as it has already been granted by your mere existence.
Under The United States Republic’s Constitutional system of Government and upon
the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control one’s conduct to others, leaving
one the sole judge as to all that affects oneself. Mugler v. Kansas
123 US 623, 659 – 60:
You may be thinking, after reading the above stare decisis case law, that
many of the ‘people’, act ignorantly, are ill-educated and uncivilized, as if they have no civilized
or civilian training. This indicates a sad state of affairs when taking into consideration that a civilian is one
who is in astute in the law.
Civilian. Private citizen, as distinguished from such
as belong to the armed services, or (in England) the church. One who is skilled or versed in the civil law.
What ought come to your mind next, is the fact that the masses have in fact been mis-taught, and it is high time,
we begin to implement institutions of thought that teach the people the truth about heritage, history and birthrights, their
substantive, unalienable rights of birth! The reason governments are established in the first place are to secure those
rights. Those are the principles of civilization (ancient as they are) that sustain life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness for all.
US Supreme Court in US vs. Minker, 350 US 179 at page 187: "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect
for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance."
those who are not certain as to how to begin, you may want to recognize that the 14th and 15th amendment are firstly, not ratified,
and are therefore unconstitutional. As well, they are amendments that brought the brand of negroe, colored
and blacks into the status of a corporate person with a strategic implementation that eludes to slavery, starting with the
birth certificate, the registration point of the chattel. The birth certificate implies the exchange of finance, and
is a negotiable bond, placed upon each individual, this is bureaucratic slavery. A certificate absolutely implies finance.
Slavery is prohibited upon the penalty of death, according to the constitution, Amendment 13. This is why it
is imperative that you declare you are a natural person, as opposed to a corporate person who may be found to have no Rights
to be denied. As well, you must declare your Nationality, as there is only one race – the human race,
comprised of many Nationalities. Natural people have natural rights of birth. Corporate people do not, as they have
privileges as chattel property. You will note many of the case laws utilize the expression of ‘natural person’
when expressing the rights secured in the constitution.
The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter.
That which it meant
when it was adopted, it means now.”
S. Carolina v. U.S.,
199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905).
PDF below was posted by CBS of Georgia on January 31, 2011, regarding Senator Franklins proposed Bills #7, 11, and 21.
There are other Letters such as the Letter from Samuel E. Rohrer, State Representative of the Commonwealth,
Harrisburg Pennsylvania, written to a Judge regarding Substantive Rights, in 2006; and, Arizona State Senator,
Wayne Stump, who in 1985 recognized the organic national constitution and indicated the drivers instrument
as a contract that can be rescinded. Both have already been posted on this site, and are being posted
again here in PDF format.
CBS Posting of Senator Franklin's House Bills
Letter To Judge from State Representative Rohrer
Letter from Wayne Stump, Arizona DMV to Law Enforcement