Writs on this Page, and throughout this site, unless otherwise stated, are typed on 8.5 x 14" paper.  The history of legal paper is based on the scientific fact and anatomical harmony that if you were to hold up any paper, including a roll or scroll, the range of ease of reading, as it relates to eye, hand, and arm extension coordination, that could be read comfortably, does not extend beyond the scope of 14".    

.

posted 18th day of December 2012

.

In Regards to "Boiler Plates" and "Paper Terrorism"

.

It has come to our attention that many of the usurping defactos, municipalities (Roman Venues), courts, government entities, etc. have declared that "Moors" are utilizing "boiler plates" from websites and such "Writs" are not to be received by 'them' for that reason.  Let us with a reasoning mind, think about the FACT that there exist nothing but boiler plates when dealing with those same entities.  When utilizing an attorney, when going on a so-called government web-site; what is there but "Boiler Plates" and forms to be filled out?  These are assertions intended to discourage one from moving forward with exercising their rights and remedies.

.

However, the most important and impactive problem you may experience is to submit a Writ that you yourself do not overstand, inner stand and understand.   This is usually because you have not read it.  Many think there is a 'silver bullet' that they can shoot, yet do not know how to operate the device.  This is attributed to a mind set that is looking for a saviour outside of themselves studying and casting their own 'spells'.  This is the direct effect of the 'spell' of the Christian Crusades, in other words a European mindset and not a Moor National mindset. 

Note:  When ask "Do You Understand" in a court, know that that question in its terminology is a 'lawful' question, answering it 'yes' means you  stand under the jurisdiction and thereby submit to their jursidiction.  At the point that they realize you are NOT submitting because you have answerd "No I don't undertand", they then turn the question into a comprehensive question and will then say you need a psychological evaluation.  Don't be shook by this, as this is trickery, deceit and fraud.  They just attempted to flip the script.  The answer to that from you is "I object, I am not suffering from constitutional psychopathic inferiority.   

Constitutional Psychopathic Inferiority:  Individuals who show a lifelong and constitutional tendency not to conform to the customs of the group, and who habitually misbehave, and have no sense of responsibility to their fellow men or to society as a whole.  These individuals fail to learn by experience and are inadequate, incompatible, and inefficient.

Per the definition, many do in fact suffer 'constitutional psychopathic inferiority'.

.

Updated 18th day of December 2012

.

About The Writs On This Page and Throughout This Site

.

     These Writs are for those with a National Mindset and Consciousness.  They are made available for Study, Review and Application.  Proper use comes with overstanding, understanding, followed by the innate power of inner-standing, which means you "got it", and you are not wrongfully thinking that paper-work defines you, or who you are; it is a brief regarding you, who you are, and defines your position regarding a matter. 

.

     Being aware that there may be some who attempt to utilize these Writs, without the innerstanding, thus may find "they don't seem to work", as only they will, if you "wear them with honor", and are able to stand on them squarely, upon any challenge.  You must know in your heart what is being stated, as you are stating it, and you will be challenged spiritually as well.  Words have power, and assist in creating your reality. 

. 

     The Greater Truth is that there ought to be (more) Organizations, and Aboriginal Law Associations / associates that exercise the "Protocols Of Liberty".  The only true Lawyer, is one who upholds the true and Supreme Law, which is the Constitution.  Thus, one may say they are a Constitutional Lawyer, of which, there essentially is no such thing because the Rule of Law is derived from the Constitution and is universal, common to all, thus commonlaw can NEVER be extinct, because the Law is based in common principles.  All Law and all authority is derived from the Constitution.  All Judges, and Officers of the Court take an Oath to uphold it and derive their Authority from it.  The Constitution does not list the unalienable birth rights that you are born with, it preserves, protects and secures them.  Governments are in place for the sole reason of protecting and preserving the rights of the people.  Thus, a Lawyer is a "Law-Man" or Lay man.  Things are considered simplified when one says in lay man terms....", meaning in law-man terms.  The Law resides with and within you, as you are the Law.  A good question to ask yourself is what is an Attorney-at-Law?  It is just what it states, one who is practicing Law, but is not the Law.  Law is common to all, and there is no license to practice law, or to exercise your Rights.  Thus there is no such thing as a Licensed Attorney.  The definition of one who is 'in propria persona' (proper person / natural person), brings forth the truth regarding Attorneys as follows:

In Propria Persona: In one’s own proper person. It was formerly a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by an Attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an Attorney is an Officer of the Court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained Leave, which admits the jurisdiction.

     And there you have it.  An Attorney is a Bounty Hunter with a suit and tie on.  He brings you before the Court and Leaves you there.  Thus the Court has Leave (another way of saying they have jurisdiction over you).  An Attorney is an Officer of the Court, thus his obligation is to the Court.  To add insult to the injury, or to the corruption, the Court he is obligated to is a defacto court, a colorable court, operating in Collusion, and in color-of-law.  This is more reason why you cannot utilize an Attorney.  An attorney speaks for inanimate objects, corporations, who cannot speak for themselves.  He or she possesses a Bar Association Card, which is a membership card -- it is not a license, besides a license to practice law does not exist.  As well a license is permission to do something that is otherwise unlawful.  Utilizing an Attorney admits you to their Jurisdiction, which is ABSOLUTELY inferior, they have no jurisdiction over you.  They are inferior Courts and as such they possess no delegation of authority because legislation DOES NOT give administrative courts judicial powers.  Boy, have we been duped!  Municipal courts, Administrative Courts, and Officers of such Courts, administrators, Agencies and agents alike, etc., operate under Color-of-Law, even though they have taken an Oath to uphold the Constitution, and the laws of the United States (USC Codes).  They have created a colorable jurisdiction, as they have no Jurisdiction over the Natural Person.  Colorable persons or fictitious, persons, corporate persons, chattel property, fall up under their colorable jurisdiction.  This is why it is so very important to Declare your Natural Status.  Their authority is over those who are in their Jurisdiction, who subscribe to them, i.e.. Union States (U.S.) Citizens, corporations, those who are labeled Indian, Negroe, Colored, Black, etc.  Thus it is necessary for you to Declare that you are not a corporate person, nor are you a member of the Union States Society.  This is done through the universal process of Nationalization.  First you must be a National, then you can Nationalize or do Inter-national trade, activity, etc. and claim your inheritance, your lost estate.  Declaring your Nationality indicates your natural status and links you back to the human family and the Family of Nations.  

.

    There is a need for people to overstand the "Rudder and The Sextant", which is an explanation of the operations or navigation of protocols and governing principles, as the "Great Seal Association" was established for that purpose to affectuate those measures.  These principles must be activated as a group Association with qualified associates.  Dues can be taken, particularly for a "Defense Fund", for anyone who is in need of protocols being expressed, i.e., they have been kidnapped, and (a National) on the outside can speak for them as Consul (Article III).  However, this doesn't mean they are actually a friend of such colorable Courts, which is why one must be careful in making that statement especially for the record of a colorable, defacto tribunal.  This means they are a friend of Law and Due Process of Law.   They can speak for another, however they can never represent another.  They can enter documents into the Court and make Lawful Demands to the Court, on their behalf.  That activity is what Nationhood is.   

.

      Writing is "spelling", casting spells, as has been executed upon the masses for domination and control.  (save the physical force), which is cloaked behind the act of making offers in writing to coerce you towards making a commitment that you don't have to make.  This makes the intent of domination easier.  Failing to respond in Law indicates that things stand, because there is no rebuttal, no response.  This is why often you are given 10 days, or so, to respond.  

.

     The offers that are made to you do not have to be accepted by you.  However, you must respond to those offers in writing.  Although the written documents you receive, or that are placed before you to sign, may be written with an air of authority, it does not mean that the agency, association, etc., who wrote them to you, is the authority, or holds any authority over you.  One must prove such authority to you.  Upon that proper request for them to prove their authority, you will find the authority they appear to have, does not exist! 

. 

     Writs are a matter of Lawful correspondence.  In fact always head everything as an "Affidavit" -- not a "Motion".  A Motion gives them the option to refuse it, as it is in most corporate or social membership meetings, a Motion needs to be seconded, and if not, it does not stand.  You must respond and correspond in Law, in writing with Affidavits, as in an "Affidavit of Fact", or Affidavit of Truth, then choose your subheading as it relates to the matter you are dealing with, i.e. "Demand For Dismissal", "Summary Judgement", "Cause Of Action", "Right Of Action", "Judicial Notice', "Writ In Nature Of Discovery", (Bill Of Particulars), Name Reclamation", etc.

.  

     A Ticket / Summons is a Suit against you, you must counter it Lawfully.  Although it has been presented unlawfully, because the person who suis you cannot serve you too, and they certainly can't also be the witness for prosecution.  Many hats a simple police man (policy enforcer) wears while his actions are a violation of separation of powers.  By doing so, he is acting unlawfully in both his professional and personal capacity, and / is acting under the Color-of Office and Color-Of-Law.  Often, particularly regarding traffic, Officers are acting as "Collection Agents, for other agencies, and are taking action against you for a supposed debt, or "failure to pay" a contract (that doesn't lawfully exist), usually a surcharge, which in itself is an unlawful impost.  Therefore, at the moment of hindering you from traveling, he is acting as an agent for an agency, and not as a public trustee.  This is the game that has been used against the people to exploit them while also violating their substantive rights.  

.

     There is Law (proper), and there is "Color-of-Law, a semblance of that which is real--yet is not.  This they practice daily upon the masses.  There is a  Corporate Person, (a corporation), and there is a Natural Person (You).  A Natural Person can be injured, and when injured, remedy exist.  In fact ,unless there is an injured party, there is no violation before the court for you to seek remedy for.  You can only either injure a body, injure property, or breach a contract.  Anything outside of that is not an injury and it violates your right to be left alone, to do as you freely wish, provided you do not violate anyone else's right to the same.  Yet, a fictitious person or corporation cannot be injured.  There are two different "Persons" at Law, and you must know the difference and know which one you are or are not.  

.

A Corporation is a "Person", (Corporate Person), and then you are a Person (Natural Person).  In Law there is "Civil Liter Mortus" meaning "dead in the eyes of the Law", and there is "In Full Life"  thus one has Rights, which are preserved in Law (Constitution).   Start to utilize the Constitution for your preservation of Rights and your immunities.  Get a law dictionary to look up these terms.  You must be conscious of the fact that you are a Natural Person by Nature, not a branded or labeled Person, such as Negro, Colored, Black, African-American (which is an identification of two continents), and is a Corporate or fictitious Person.  These brands and labels that you may claim, if that is what you are claiming, are not a part of the human family, thus have no Rights to be preserved for them or for their posterity. 

. 

     Your acceptance of assumed authority and policies, as Law, when they are NOT Law, makes them stand, at least for as long as you do not rebut them, and continue to make contracts or agreements regarding them.  They don't stand just because the agency, corporations, association, etc. says so --they stand because you say so, by not rebutting, or responding.  Therefore you become a party to them, a party to the fraud.  If there is no response from you, it means things stand as they have stated, assumed, or coerced and put in writing (spelled).  Usually you then sign whatever they have put in writing, therefore, again, you are a party to the fraud.  When you do sign something, it is usually under Threat, Duress and coercion (T.D.C.).  Anything done under threat, duress or coercion cannot stand in Law.  Indicate the threat with your signature.  If you do not spell it out, put 'T.D.C.' , indicating you were under threat, duress and coercion and that your Rights were being violated by force.  At a minimum you must sign all things with "all rights reserved", so that you can manage your way out of anything that in fact abrogates your rights, particularly under non-disclosed conditions.  ,   

.

Note:  some say they attempt to tell you that you cannot sign 'all rights reserved'.  This is absurd, no one can tell you how to sign your autograph.  This is clear indication they those who told you this, are intent and trained to deprive you.  Even if it is part of their 'job-training' therefore they can claim they didn't know, still they are depriving you, and ignorance of the law works both ways. What authority do they have to tell you how to sign or autograph?  They need to receive from you, a 'Notice of Color-of-Law Violations' to them personally.

.

Signature:  The act of putting down a mans name at the end of an instrument to attest its validity , the name thus written.  A "signature" may be written by hand, printed, stamped, typewritten, engraved, photographed, or cut from one instrument and attached to another, and a signature lithographed on an instrument by a party is sufficient for the purpose of signing it; it being immaterial with what kind of instrument a signature is made. Smith v. Greenville County, 188 S.C. 349, 199 S.E. 416, 419.  Maricopa County v. Osborn, 60 Ariz. 290, 136 P.2d 270, 274.

.

And whatever mark, symbol, or device one may choose to employ as representative of himself is sufficient.  Griffith v. Bonawitz, 73 Neb. 622, 103 N.W. 327, 339. 

.    

Signature Manual:  An autograph a signature; specifically, the official signature of a sovereign, chief magistrate, or the like, to an official document as letters patent, to give validity.  Webster, Dict; Wharton, Law Dict.

     .

     You and I, are not intending to violate anyones policies, however, we are not going to allow any onespolicies to violate our Rights.  This is upheld in the Constitution for the United States, Article VI.  They can make statutes, policies, and ordinances all day long, however if those statutes, policies and ordinances violate the Laws of the Constitution, they are not with standing (unless you agree they are).

.

    So state your position in writing, and caste your "spells" well.  Know that all contracts are an offer that you may refuse, counter, deny, or accept, however it must be done in writing -- "The Writ" -- the Spell-ing.

.

.