|
|
Peter 2/2:3 And through covetousness
shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of along time lingereth not and their damnation
slumbereth not. Covetouness: Inordinately desirous, especially of something
belonging to someone else. Greedy, acquisitive, grasping, avaricious mean having a srong desire for possessions; Grasping:
adds to covetousness the implication of selfishness and often suggest the use of wrongful or unfair means.
.
Police, City, nor State cannot deprive Natural People
of
Their unalienable / inalienable absolute “Right To Travel”
Liberties are Broad, however, in it’s most strictest sense it means the following:
Personal
Liberty: The Right or Power of Locomotion; of changing one’s
situation; or moving one’s person to whatsoever place one’s own inclination may direct without
imprisonment or restraint unless by due course of law.
Upon this Constitutional Republic form of government, the only
thing you owe the public is due care.
Under
The United States Republic’s Constitutional system of Government and upon the individuality and intelligence of the
citizen, the state does not claim to control one’s conduct to others, leaving one the sole judge as to all that affects
oneself. Mugler v. Kansas 123 US 623, 659 – 60: The Right to Travel; The Right
to Mode of Conveyance; The Right to Locomotion are all absolute rights, and the Police can
not make void the exercise of rights. State v. Armstead, 60 s. 778, 779, and 781:
The Right of a citizen to Travel upon the public highways and to transport one’s property
thereon, either by carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege, which a City may
prohibit or permit at will, but a common right, which he / she has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 579: The State is prohibited from violating
substantive rights. Owens v. City, 445 US 662 (1980); and it can not do by one
power (eg. Police power) that which is, for example, prohibited expressly to any other such power (eg. Taxation / Eminent
Domain) as a matter of law. US and UT v. Daniels, 22 p 159, nor indirectly that which is prohibited to it
directly. Fairbanks v. US 181, US 283, 294, 300:
The
Right to Park or Travel is part of the Liberty of which the Natural
Person, citizen cannot be deprived without “due process
of law” under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Kent v. Dulles 357 US
116, 125:
Highwayman: A bandit; one who robs travelers upon the highway.
Source:
Black’s Law 4th Edition Dictionary p.862 . It is NOT
the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION
and arrest code breakers.
(SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E.
2nd. 247)
. .
NOTE:
They are Policy and Code Enforcers / Highwaymen, who also act as Mercenaries. YOUR Right To Travel upon the
Land is not a 'policy', nor is it embodied in a code. It is a substantive 'Right of Birth', that cannot be abridged
or liened upon, thus unalienable and inalienable. You are the Traveler, unless you are doing commerce, you are
not a driver. It seems miniscule, however it is the truth of fact. Words are very important as that is what Jurisdiciton
is - 'right words'.
PAGE CONTENTS: .
Senator Franklin - Georgia Proposal to Abolish Drivers License 2011
Analysis of Senator Franklin - Georgia Proposal
.
Letter To Judge From Senator, Regarding Right To Travel (2006)
.
Letter to Arizona Dept of Public Safety from Senator (1995)
. Any Government
Entity and Officers of said Entity DO NOT OPERATE AS A SEPERATE
GOVERNMENT !! THEY ARE TRUSTEES / PUBLIC
OFFICIALS OF THE ESTABLISHED LAW OF THE LAND FOR
EVERYBODY! . It
is necessary to clear up a very confusing and misleading 'belief'. Any government entity and Officers of
such entities established in this land (North American Continent) are TRUSTEES / PUBLIC OFFICIALS of the inheritance
of the Moors -- The land, the resources of the land, etc. They (European Colonist and any Government Entity
and Officers) DO NOT HAVE A GOVERNMENT on their own. This is the land of the Moors. Lemuria / Northwest Amexem/
Northwest Africa/ North America. We the people of the united states (The Moorish Nation State) do ordain and establish
THIS constitution FOR the United States of America. This being done with several processes in
bringing 'OTHERS' into the American National Constitutional Fold of government, (however EVERYONE is NOT
the American National, aboriinal an indigenous to the land) one of them being the pre-mandate: The Treaty of Peace
and Friendship, then the Constitution was established as the LAw of the Land as to the laws governing one's behavior in the
land. The United States of America is a corporation and corporations do not tell the natural people what to do. The
Natural peole have already established the laws that govern all. Many Moors think in error that they must START a
new Government, a new Nation and they are in grave error as this is their inheritance, their illustrious estate, and they
are the aboriginal and indigenous people who establsihed the Constitution as the LAW OF THE LAND for EVERYBODY!!! And
it is a Repbulic -- Not a Democracy. Those who support Democracy are committing Treason against the people. The
European colonists are naturalized citizens here. As Public Officers / Trustees they have a fiduciary duty to protect
and preserve the Rights of the Natural People. This is why Prophet Noble Drew said to enforce the Constitution: The North
American Republic Constitution FOR the United States of America. . Res Judicata: A
matter adjudged; a thing judicially acted upon or decided; a thing or matter settled
by judgment. A phrase of the civil law, constantly quoted in the books. Rules that final
judgment or decree on merits by court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive of rights of parties or their privies in all later suits
on points and matters determined in former suit. And to be applicable, requires identity in thing sued for as well as identity of cause of action, of persons and parties to action, and of quality in person for or against whom claim is made. The sum substance of the whole rule is that a matter once
judicially decided is finally decided. Note: This is in regards to ‘Stare Decisis’
case laws, which apply to ALL states and several states, etc. This is distinguished with Estoppel as it is
the basis upon a cause and need for an Estoppel, the intent of an Estoppel in its broadest sense is penalty paid by one perpetrating
wrong [defacto court adminstrators] by known fraud or by affirmative act which, though with (or without) fraudulent intent,
may result in legal fraud on another. This is what is being done in most of the defacto fraudulent courts in that they violate
the law against the people, yet they are deemed to know the law by their very position and seats they sit in.
. “Officers of the court have
no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622.
Adminstrator’s
defined government succinctly. “Governments are corporations”, in as much as every government
is an artificial person, an abstraction, a creature of the mind only, a government can deal only with artificial persons.
The imaginary, having no reality or substance cannot create or attain parity with the real. Penhallow
V. Doane’s.
..
The Postion of Sheiks and Grand Sheiks is Supported in Law and in Article III of the Constitution
Jus praetorium: In civil law. The discretion of the praetor, as distinct from
the leges, or standing laws. That kind of law which the praetors introduced
for the purpose of aiding, supplying, or correcting the civil law, for the public benefit.
. Note: This is the
position the Sheiks and Grand Sheiks (are supposed) to hold and effectuate in
the spirit of ‘making law and enforcing law’ for the Moorish Nation, as the Moorish Nation
is the authorizing nation state and encompasses the whole body of law—"jus”, by
way of “jus sanguine” (by blood) and being in this land, which is the Estate
and dominion of Moors. The Grand Sheiks position is supported in Article III of the Constitution FOR the United States of America (Ministers and Consuls).
State Governments are but Trustees with a derived Authority 4 Wheat 402
.
posted January 10 2014 ADDITIONAL INFO ON FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES IN REGARDS TO DRIVERS LICENSE INSTRUMENTS AND THE NATURAL PEOPLE .
We have added additional 'Travel' Case Laws and information
for your review, study and application. There
are another set of case laws that are and have always been at the end of this page in PDF format entitled 'Vehicle Traffic and Judges', along with a "Ticket Dismissal Document. We have copied the "Do You Know Your Rights?" document from the open readings downloads page and attached it here as well. Within it are 13 supreme court case laws, most of them involve traveling.
We have also added a PDF that gives you supports when a State Court denies your Affidavits and tells you the Supreme
Court rulings DO NOT apply to them because they are from another state. This is a farce, pursuant to Article VI, all law and all Supreme Court rulings apply to the Several States, to all the States. The issue would then
become a matter of "Diversity of Citizenship', as a natural person would follow the
Laws of the Land, and so must any government entity. Those who are members / citizen sof a corporate state obviously
agree to folow the policies, statutes, etc. of said state. Of which the corporate states policies are not law and
they apply to a specific 'class' of persons and those persons are NOT the natural people. Remember persons can
mean corporations as it is in the first clause of the 14th amendment. The information contained
within the 'Denial Of Affidavits' - Of Case Laws is what you need to know. We
also have attached information in regards to Jurisdiction of a court, in pursuance to Article III, and this is for when they tell you that they are a 'quasi-criminal court', of which there is
no such lawful sanction for, it is in the definition a 'semblance' of that which is real, it is a Colorable Office, exercising
Color-of-Law and operating under Color-of-Authority, which means it is NOT A VALID court, and it has NO JUDICIAL AUTHORITY granted to it from the
Legislature, as the Legislation DOES NOT grant judicial authority to ministerial, incompetent courts. . Driving is a COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY
and the license instrument is for DRIVERS ONLY -- for commerce, going to the store, to visit a friend, etc., IS NOT COMMERCIAL
ACTIVITY. As a natural and substantive right, you have the right to Travel upon the land without license, registration,
tags, insurance, etc. Of course, you owe the public 'due care', and you must remedy any injury you make to another or another's property. However to be exploited and violated
in a manner that causes you injury via stealing your Rights and your property, including your body being
imprisoned, or rather kidnapped, is another issue. To send 'Revenue Collectors' on the highway, feigning as police officers,
when they are private police enforcers carrying guns and enforcing 'policies', and are breaking the law themselves, which
prove they are not 'law enforcers', is another issue. For those who think they MUST have a DMV teach their children 'due
care', we suggest you re-think that, and recognize that your child can learn to operate a conveyance, be it an automobile,
a truck, a tractor, etc., without the exploitation of a private corporation for profit called the DMV, feigning
as a government entity. In fact the 'permit' is sufficient, unless it has adhesions that
place you or your child in a state's jurisdiction that operates under Color-of-Authority and with the intent to exploit the Law. . .
Additional 'Travel' Case laws
.
Personal Liberty Case Laws
Personal Liberty is the Right to Locomotion, the right to travel freely without restriction unless
by Due Process of Law!!!! It is a fundamental substantive right, a right of birth - a birth right. "Come
hear the truth about your Nationality and Birthrights" .
.
Denial Of Affidavits Regarding Case Laws
.
.
Quasi-Criminal Court?
.
.
Reason For Treason
.
Do You Know Your Rights? 13 Points of Law
.
posted October 10th 2010 .. Writ To General Asembly & 'Order Of Protection' - by Sister Anaidah El The PDF
Below is a Writ To The Connecticut State General Assembly by Sister Anaidah El. Enclosed in it is a questionnaire
for the General Assembly to answer, as it was originally sent to the respecctive state's DMV and the Commissioner of
said DMV was unable or unwilling to answer it. You may adopt it and send to the local State DMV operating in your
Territory, be sure to have it sealed. Also included in the PDF is an "Order of Protection". All Moors
can copy it down and use it, as it is for all Moors based on, but not limited to the facts that Moors ARE NOT and CANNOT
be citizens of the corporate united states of america, or any of its enclaves, as indicated in the original and organic 13th
amendment with 20 sections and in accord with the 'Treaty of Peace and Friendship' and the 'United States Republic Constitution'. Documents
contained within this PDF are printed on 8.5 x 11. Parchment paper stands out best for the 'Order of Protection'. .
Writ To General Assembly & Order Of Protection For Moors
.
Posted
October 25, 2010.Division of Motor Vehicles – Failure To Disclose . By Sister Anaid El . According to the State(s), one is required to
obtain a Certificate of Title and to register their private property (conveyance) with the Motor Vehicle Department.
Attached is an interesting written dissertation between Bruce McCarthy, a citizen of Missouri, and the Missouri Motor
Vehicle Department. McCarthy was requesting clarification as to their requirements regarding obtaining
a title, which equates to asking what Law supports their position and compels anyone to have to obtain a certificate of title
from them, and register their vehicle with them. The Motor Vehicle Department(s) states that in order for
one to show proof of ownership of their personal property, they must receive a certificate of title from the state,
and then they must register it, turning it into a motor vehicle, which then places it as their (Motor Vehicle Department)
property under commerce.
. Essentially, factually and lawfully, in doing
so, one is surrendering ownership of their property to the State Department, of which the property was
not bought from the state, nor does the State have the Bill of Sale or receipt –you do from whomever and wherever you
bought it. To add insult to the injury and the fraud, one is paying to sell their property to the Sate,
via title cost and other taxes. Essentially, the unsuspecting, unknowing citizen is enriching the corporate
state, allowing them to gain further assets perpetually and annually via registration, insurance, tags, etc., which are taxes. . McCarthy’s
poses an interesting question to the State Department of Motor Vehicles: “What proof of ownership
exist prior to one obtaining a certificate and registering their personal property with the Motor Vehicle Department?”
The written exchange is very informative and unveiling. As Moorish American National citizens, we
care to address a few points for you to keep in mind when reading the article.
Point #1: As a Moorish American National, you cannot be a member /
citizen of any union state. Per United States Republic Original
13th Article of the Bill of Rights: “. . . No one of African descent can
be citizens.”
Point # 2: It is implied within this dissertation and in numerous communications/directives
from the various member-states, as well as the federal government, that states relate to the land. However,
they do not, as the land is the inheritance of the Moors and was never given, exchanged, nor can it ever be sold to anyone.
Therefore whenever you read anything that says “In the State of Missouri” (or elsewhere) know that this does not
include any portion of any land on the American Continent. It only refers to a political allegiance, of which Moorish American
is a political allegiance / jurisdiction for Moors in America. Point # 3: The State of Missouri, State of Connecticut, State of New
York, State of New Jersey, State of (whatever) etc., are federal enclaves. They are subsidiaries of the Federal Government.
Therefore, whatever applies in Missouri applies in every federal enclave and is not specific to any one federal enclave.
This trickery, misrepresentation is used to mislead the people and keep them thinking they are dealing with separate and independent
union states. Yet, they are not. All of the union states have been taken over and converted
to federal enclaves. Point # 4:
Always keep in mind that the government was created for the people, by the people, for one purpose and that
is to secure, preserve, and protect the unalienable rights of the people. Therefore, no
government can hinder, compromise, enslave, abrogate, or convert any of the ‘Rights of the People’.
Per the United States Republic Declaration of Independence:
“.
. . to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed
. . . “
“Where
rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”;
Miranda v. State of Arizona, 86 S.Ct. 1602 at 1636, 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (U.S.Ariz.1966)
The following are additional
case laws to keep in mind while reviewing the "Manufacturers statement of Origin" in PDF FORM
at end of this document: “A
state cannot impose restrictions on the acceptance of a license that will deprive the licensee of his constitutional rights”.
Ruckenbrod v. Mullins, 102 Utah 548, 133 P.2d. 325, 144 ALR 839
There
can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of the exercise of a constitutional right.
Sherar
v. Cullen,
481 F. 945 (9th Cir. 1973) Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967) GARRITY
v. NEW JERSEY, 385 U.S. 493 (1967) BOYD v. U S, 116 U.S. 616 (1886)
MALLOY
v. HOGAN,
378 U.S. 1 (1964)
. “No
state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock
v. Penn., 319 US 105
. “A writing is ‘void ab initio’ in the case
of fraud in the inception, and it need not be formally rescinded as a prerequisite to right of avoidance”. Bonacci
v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., (1943) 58 CA 2d 657,664. . When a citizen is attempting to enforce the Constitution, as herein
shown, he is doing so "not for himself alone but also [for others] as a 'private attorney general' vindicating
a policy that [the Constitution writers] considered of the highest priority." Newman
v Piggie Park Enterprises, 390 US 400; 88 S Ct 964, 966; 19 L Ed 2d 1263, 1265 (1969); Oatis v Crown Zellerbach
Corp, 398 F2d 496, 499 (CA 5, 1968); and Jenkins v United Gas Corp, 400 F2d 28, 33 n 10 (CA 5, 1968).
"An administrative regulation, of course, is not a "statute."
U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431
Statutes must be known:
"Vagueness of wording is aggravated
by prolixity and profusion of statutes, regulations, and administrative machinery, and by manifold cross-references to interrelated
enactments and rules," Keyishian v Board of Regents of U. of
St. of N. Y., 385 US 603, 604; 87 S Ct 675, 684; 17 L Ed 2d 629 (1967).
. Please keep the above points and Case Laws in mind while reviewing this 30-page document.
. The
below "Manufacturers Statement of Origin, By Bruce G. McCarthy, consist of approximately 33 letters
of correspondence between him and the Divison of Motor Vehicles. It demonstrates the process used by the DMV's to take
ownership of your automobile. It is a great study for comprehension. We have put in it a PDF format for you
to print or download. .
Manufacturer's Statement of Origin
.
. Drivers License Fraud By Taj Tarik Bey . The
'Highest Court' in the Land (possessing Original Jurisdiction) has ruled that "No State can make any laws or rules that abrogate the Peoples’
Rights or the Supreme Law of the Land". However, due to extreme levels of debauchery, misprision and fraud
permeating all levels of government, by dishonest politicians, judges, and prosecutors, the Natural People
have been consistently robbed and suffer the destructive results of abuse of authority. Criminals wearing black robes,
and faking as Article III judges, have created and acted as auctioneers, administering a system of deception that
has led many unsuspecting Natural People into “believing” that they (the accused) have violated the Law, when in fact they
have not. The theives and criminal officers of municipals courts all over the land, have converted Rights,
secured and reserved for the People, into crimes. Thereafter, fining and jailing them, under a 'Color of Law' and a 'Color
of Authority'. Color means, "A an appearance, a semblence, or simulacrum, as distingquished from that which is
real". Color, Fake, Immitation, Misrepresentation, and Fraud are synonyms. . Concerning the social position of the
Natural People, in their relationships with others: “Due care” is an important issue, and involves
having and maintaining a keen sense of responsibility to recognize the rights of others. This is the social duty of all
citizens and Natural People, when interacting publicly and with others. A lack of preserving civil responsibilities, or a blatant neglect
of civilized principles (morals and ethics) would be detrimental to all. A fundamental
knowledge of the 'de jure' Law of the Land, (Constitution / Treaties) which preserves and secures the Rights of all Natural
Beings and citizens, is a common social obligation, relegated to all members of a society. Ignorance,
greed, colonialism, and the construction of fraudulent adhesion contracting (legal frauds) have caused many to divulge themselves
as being far less than honorable, and reveals their true deceptive tendencies and will to violate the basic moral and ethical
principles of civilization. Unkind actions and anti-constitutional legislation, created by the 'unclean
hands' of ill-trusted corporate administrators, have proven highly destructive to the 'Unalienable Rights' of the Natural
People. Unalienable Rights are Rights which are not 'Alienable. This means that such Rights cannot be transferred
or sold to another, etc. .
Political
thieves (usually descendants of European Colonists operating upon the American Continents) have, by outright criminality, taken unlawful leave and advantages of the usurped seats of government, and have polluted the sanctity of
their Official Oaths to uphold the Constitution and Treaties and are unlawfully violating the Natural People.
Consequently, much of the ignorance (plaguing and stagnating the Natural People) has more to do with deliberate misguidance,
misprision, falsehoods, and miseducation. This is due to a designed lack of knowledge, deviously promoted and controlled
by these same miscreants. Pseudo-government operatives, (administrative) have knowingly, and with forethought,
often substituted themselves for true (Article III judicial) sanctioned authorities. Organized criminal controlers of these
misrepresented seats or offices of authority, have made and generated incalculable amounts of finance for unchecked municipal
racketeers. . Racketeering is a law
term that applies to an organized conspiracy to commit the crimes of extortion or coercion, or attempts to commit extortion
or coercion. Racketeering is the obtaining of money or property from another, without his consent, induced by the wrongful
use of force or fear. The fear which constitutes the legally nescessary element in extortion is induced by oral or written
threats to do an unlawful injury to the property of the treatened person by means of explosives, fire, or otherwise; or to
kill, kidnap, or injure him or her, or a relative of his or her family, etc. .
"Purgery - of - Oath" perpetrators - being the unsanctioned administrators ministers of cities,
towns, boroughs - inclusive of their contracted Municipal Court officers, have usurped judicial powers (for their
own private benefit). Many have suffered beuroghcratic forced - servitude by their unlawful acts; as they have used jurisdictional
powers (not delegated to them) to incarcerate people, and to colorably put people at risk; placing them into perpetual patterns of legal (yet not lawful) compromission; and bringing about losses
of property, losses of finances, and constant abrogation of their Unalienable Rights and Substantive Rights.
Poverty and theft by design, incorporating jail, as an industry, has been used to State agents and agencies
to impose coercive extorcion - initiated by "lack - of - due - process Pleas" made before unlawful
private corporate tribunals. Most of these being misrepresented as legitimate courts. This politically—protected
criminality has hindered many Natural People from enjoying or exercising Rights secured by the Constitution / Treaty and the
Bill of Rights. Criminals in government have thus, imposed feudal fees upon the people, converting
rights into crimes, and hindering them
from traveling, etc. .
When the Natural People (Heirs Apparent) have, possess, or gain a clear understanding and knowledge of how they have been robbed and exploited by these
foreign, unworthy adulterers of the Law, they can, and will, begin such necessary (anti-racketeering) actions and studies
as needed to remedy their injuries and begin to turn around the conspiratorial extortions and foul acts of arbitrary commited
on a daily basis. It must be clearly understood by all that the States' "drivers license instruments" are
a 'Corporate Use Tax” relegated to foreign corporate privileges, and are 'Customs Payments' made to the alleged
'Sovereign', and deemed for commercial usage and privilege. When Natural Persons are operating their
own private vehicles, conveyances, automobiles, or vessels, unless they are corporately carrying passengers for hire, they are not “driving”; they are “traveling”.
Driving pertains to commercial activities. Traveling the public roadways and highways are natural and Substantive Rights;
having nothing to do with privleges. This clear distinction between the words, driving and traveling may
seem to be trivial to some readers, however, that specificity has caused many to lose a substantial amount of freedoms and
finance. For many poor families, this disingenuousness has manifested into politically instigated and targeted
economic states of “Depression”. .
Below is an example and explanation about the misuse of administrative and ministerial powers. These
facts and concepts may help one to understand how to get out from under the foul yoke of being robbed by agencies and
persons who have been, and are, using extortion tactics, guised under the misrepresented Surcharges. .
Suspended Driving Instrument Due To Failure To Pay Surcharge .
If you
(the Natural Person)are operating with the States' imposed driving instrument, and had a "Surcharge” imposed
upon you, know that the contract - instrument is essentially a surcharge for “being stopped” from exercising
a right. It is important for one to know that such an imposed ‘Surcharge’ is an unlawful and
unauthorized ‘Impost’. Imposts are taxes, levies, or duties imposed upon foreign nations or
corporations. Surcharges are compound or secondary fees or fines, levied against one for ‘Driving’
and are typically spread over monthly extortion - payments for a few years or so. The ministerially
- adjudicated ‘Surcharges’ are usually paid (under threat of warrant or arrest) to a different entity, person,
and address other than the State-contracted Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Such acts are actually
active and constructive fraud, and are no more than collusive acts of (Conspiracy). If the Natural Person
or citizen fails to pay the ‘Surcharges’ (ransoms) in the time or manner they (employees
of the Agencies / Municipalities) have set,
or imposed, they then notify the DMV to suspend the States’ imposed license, which is rented annually for a fee. Such
an action instituted against anyone, must be relegated to (conspiracy to extort). . The Corporate Municipal Agents also notify the local courts, police officers,
townships, cities, court systems, etc., to take unwarranted legal—process actions against you (the accused violator).
The usurping State, (through its hired thieves) thusly uses “color-of Law” and “Color of Authority”
to hinder you (the Natural People and Citizens) from traveling the public roadways and highways. This deduces the use of the
driver’s license to an instrument used to effectuate and veil organized theft and extortion. The thieves then conspire
to systematically serve you (the alleged violator) with new Tickets / Suits / Bills of Exchange / Summons, to appear or pay,
or both. The colluders often threaten to, again, suspend the States’ License and may also impose possible jail time.
All of these administrative acts are unlawful. As an example: . . What is a Surcharge? . A ‘Surcharge’ is
a bill that has been filed to open a claim, an exaction, an
impost, or an encumbrance, beyond that
which is just and right; or beyond one’s authority or power.
, If a ’Surcharge’ is beyond what is just or right,
and is done without authority, doesn’t such an act constitute racketeering and other criminal actions of fraud?
One must always question Jurisdiction and consider (by way of Constitutional principles) who created these ’Surcharge’
Bills, and who opened these files? Furthermore, where was or is your copy of the Bill?
According to the rule of Discovery, you are lawfully supposed to also have been presented with an original copy of
the same! If a copy of the document / instrument
(Bill) cannot be produced by the prosecutor / accusers / claimants, with your signature, then such a Bill
is a fraud, unlawful, and un-actionable. Thus, such acts are a “Nullity”. A
’Nullity or Nully’ is a term in law, which essentially regards and refers to an unlawful administrative court
officer’s decision or action as being ’Nothing in Law” or “Void of Law. Nullies
are often attached to unconstitutional decisions made by officials acting under ’colorable’ processes.
As an aside, and addition to these facts, such agencies cannot make ‘Judicial Decisions’ - they do not possess the authority. Such powerful Article
III jurisdictional authority is not in their capacity, and such unsanctioned courts and Judges cannot violate the laws of
the Constitution, by which they are bound to support and uphold by Official Oaths. (See Article VI of the Constitution and
Oath of Ethics). Administrative Judges or Ministerial Officers (traffic court judges) do not have, or possess,
the authoritative or lawful power at all to make judicial decisions. They are ministerial in status and
character. Thus, they are incompetent, and are knowingly violating the established Law of
the Land! . - "Ministerial officers are
incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in attempting to exercise such powers are
necessarily nullities." Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1.
- "A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because
the governing principle of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony,
record, arguments, and rationale for that of the agency. Additionally, courts are prohibited from substituting
their judgment for that of the agency. Courts in administrative issues are prohibited from even listening to or hearing arguments,
presentation, or rational." ASIS v. US, 568 F2d 284.
· The State is prohibited from violating substantive rights.
Owens v. City, 445 US 662 (1980); and it can not do by one power (eg. Police power) that which is, for example, prohibited expressly to any other such power (eg. Taxation / Eminent Domain) as a matter of law. US
and UT v. Daniels, 22 p 159, nor indirectly
that which is prohibited to it directly. Fairbanks v. US 181, US 283, 294, 300:
. ·
Where rights secured by the Constitution
are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US
436, 125: .
· State courts, like federal courts, have a “constitutional obligation” to safeguard
personal liberties and to uphold federal law. Stone v. Powell 428 US 465, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1067.
.
· The obligation of state courts to give full effect to federal law is the same as that of federal courts.
New York v. Eno. 155 US 89, 15 S. Ct. 30, 39 L. Ed. 80. .
· An administrative agency may not finally decide the limits of its statutory powers; this is a judicial
function. Social Security Board v. Nierotko. 327 US 358, 66 S. Ct. 637, 162 ALR 1445, 90 L. Ed. 719. , “Lex
semper dabit remedium” = “The Law will always give a remedy.” . The reader is, at this juncture of this treatise,
presented with the responsibility to use 'reason' and to make clear distinctions
between that foul, colorable body of fraud—based legislation and policies (which are not law), and that of the 'rightful'
Supreme Law of the Land (Constitution and Treaties). . Another example of fraud is that the
perpetrators of the Surcharge Division may say that you
owe them finance. Do you have a contract with them? Did they loan you anything? There exists no lawful, willful instrument, bearing
your signature to such a contract — law—violating agreement. If you (the accused) ever ask the agent(s)
/ representative(s) / accuser(s) to provide such required contractual or documented evidence, they will not; they do not,
and they cannot. They are criminals, and are loath to produce self-incriminating evidence against their own self-serving
corruption and proof of their ‘Perjury of Oaths’. If the case or action, initiated by them,
is based upon those instruments, then they must (by due—process of law) provide it or them. Otherwise, there
is no lawful claim or case before the Court. Even if you (the accused)
did allegedly owe them, or anyone else, finance, their acts of notifying other private-law systems, or making contracts with
other agencies, (and signing on your behalf) to collect such
alleged debts, is tantamount to extortion and identity theft. When they, through their agency, contractors,
or agencies, notifies local, regional, and state, court systems and court officers, (speaking for them) to take
an ‘Action’ against you for failure to pay them, then they are committing conspiratorial extortion.
All parties involved are then acting as a collection agency. This includes the police officer(s) or policy
enforcer(s), who stopped you in the first place or instance. The initiating agent (policeman) is acting
in the capacity of a collection agent for the private corporate businesses (insurance companies, et al). Thus, the policemen
is an active partner or part of the Conspiracy. According to the Codes of Law for the United
States of North America, all officers and officials are responsible for any acts committed under ‘Color’ whether
he or she knows it or not; and whether he or she is doing what he or she is told by superiors or others, to do or to initiate
an unwarranted or colorable act! . An example of Conspiracy, corruption, and “Perjury of Oath”
becomes obvious when one reads the following Law Enforcement "Code Of Ethics", which all Law Officers must take.
.
.
 . After reading the Oath Of Ethics,
let us examine another area of Fraud: The State Motor Vehicle Agency (DMV), repeatedly and unlawfully acts in the above-stated capacity as well.
Their officers, contractors, and employees often, and regularly, receive ‘Notices’ from the other ‘Surcharge
Divisions’ to adjudicate actions geared to suspend the state’s license instrument for failure to pay them their
prescribed amount of (extortion) payments, whereas they have (by color) converted the Constitutional and Treaty—secured
Rights of the Natural People into crimes, in order to raise revenues. The DMV then arbitrarily suspends
your rights-converting license (which
is conspiratorial extortion). This promotes threats of arrest, incarceration, and the
like. This is especially evident because the DMV also charges you a ransom fee to re-instate the fraud-based
license, which they, themselves, have imposed upon the Natural People. The Constitution Principles and
Obligations, which bind all judges, legislators, representatives, and other judicial officers of the courts, (superior and
inferior) do not change or alter their obligations. .
The ‘Surcharge Division’ is sanctioned by the Courts to act on their behalf. The judge even
knows all about them and how they work (which proves collusion because he is not supposed to uphold them, they are the ones
who supposedly have a claim against you. His actions and degree of knowledge involving this company proves conflict
of interst as well, and most important, they (the accuser against you), the Surcharge or DMV Agency, is not even
in the court room to substantiate their claim against you. --This is unlawful. . The Mailing Locations: The
accused (you) are given the alleged address of the Surcharge Division as the recipient of fees and imposts that you must
pay. Then the Department of Motor Vehicles commands and threatens you to send finances or fees to
them, which is another party, with a different address. (conspiratorial extortion). We haven't added the courts
and the court fees, etc., they are in on the extortion as well, pretending that they are executing law. Ignornance
of the law is no excuse, and in this case the one who suffers from that knowledge is YOU. This is why we are sharing
this information to assist, and to enforce the Constitutional principles that protect the people, as in enforcing
it, no one will be molested, and their rights will not be turned into a crime. (Note:
Turning rights into a crime is a big money maker for them, and let's face it for some of our own, because as long as we continue
to sell the birthright by selling it on paper, we are committing a crime, "Slave trade"). . Keep in mind that the word,
‘Fee’ is relative to Feudal Law, and Feudal Law is the ‘opposite’ of Allodial. Such
an act is repulsive to Constitutional
Principles. The Surcharge Division or agency is different and separate from the Department of Motor Vehicles,
(proving conspiracy to extort and, will and intent). The State of New Jersey is an artificial ‘Person’
or ‘Entity' (as is any corporate state) created on paper by legal process, and should always be referred to as such.
. (Note: The State of New Jersey,
Incorporated, changed the name of their Motor Vehicle Agency from New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to New Jersey
Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC), not to be confused with (MVS), which is their Surcharge Division. In the State of New York, the “Surcharge Agency” is referred to, or called, ‘The
Ticket Violations Bureau’.)
. So what is Conspiracy? , . Conspiracy: Is a
combination or an agreement made or initiated between two or more persons, for accomplishing an unlawful end or a lawful end by way of unlawful means. .The essence of “conspiracy:
is an agreement, together with an overt act, to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act in an unlawful manner. Actors may drop out, and others may drop in; the details may change from time to time; and the members need not know each other or the part played by others; a member
need not know all the details of the plan or the operations; he must, however, know the purpose of the conspiracy and agree
to become a party to a plan to effectuate that purpose. . . Further, conspiracy is a consultation
or agreement between two or more persons either falsely to accuse another of a crime punishable by law; or wrongfully to injure
or prejudice a third person or any body of men, in any manner; or to commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act
with intent to prevent the course of justice; or to effect a legal purpose with a corrupt intent, or by improper means. .
. Another example of the practiced
fraud is when the officers or agents initiate and or go into the publicly—funded court rooms, using the courts to enforce
“Color of Law”. They will insistently start telling you (the accused) how much you are going to pay them for the so-called listed
infractions and violations. They (the judges, prosecutors and other court officers) try to roll right over you, while,
in the same instance, violating the ‘due - process’ restrictions placed upon them by law. You (the accused)
must be aware that they (the judges, prosecutors, policemen, etc.) are knowingly ignoring, violating, and trampling over established
‘due process’ obligations and ‘Stare Decisis’, secured for the natural People and citizens, by law.
See Amendments IV, V, Vi, VII, VIII, IX, and X, etc. Don't let their corruption go on unchallenged or un-rebutted.
Do not be afraid of the alleged "trial",
as the transcripts (containing your proper questioning and statements) at the pseudo-trial would expose them and their criminality
to others and to the Supreme Court (Original Jurisdiction). . Transcripts and documented records related to the process will (in future examinations) expose your lawful
position, vs. their unlawful practices. These facts have been, and are, usually suppressed by them (the officers of the fraud-based
courts). They do not want that information exposed to the public or to a higher court, by way of Mandamus. If
you (the accused) think you are going to a legitimate trial, as the conspiring officers have implied, and threatened you with,
then consider this: Pre-produce 12 copies of the documents and records for the (alleged) jury of your own
national peers. Demand that you preserve your rights to participate in the selection of the jury, with your Moorish
Consul present (Ministers / Grand Sheiks, etc.). They have the authoritative right to be a part of the
due—process rights preserved for them to select, screen, question, and critique the alleged jury of your peers. . One clear and pertinent question already looms over the process—Who are
the people that the officers of the court are alleging to be your peers? Are they truly Aboriginal Americans, or are these
persons actually colonial imposters and foreigners posing (fraudulently) as Americans (Al Moroccans)? The
plot begins to thicken, doesn’t it?! Review the laws of evidence as expressed in the legal definition
of ‘Identity’. . Furthermore, and in the interest of universal
Justice, it is important for all Moorish - Americans to know (factually) that ‘Traffic Courts’ are ‘Administrative Courts’. These
private corporate courts cannot lawfully have or initiate a trial, exercising judicial powers. They are essentially
kangaroo courts. It is also important to know that you (the accused) already have and possess rights to
travel the public roadways and highways of the Land. If the Natural People were to all collectively exercise these rights, we wouldn’t be easily
subjected to these unlawful processes. . There is more information and ‘Stare Decisis’
law presented on this subject. Upon further research, you will find many Supreme Court rulings preserving
the Substantive Rights of the people. In regards to not utilizing the “fraud-based driving instruments” imposed upon the people,
the information contained herein must be understood by the people collectively in order for them to lawfully exercise rights
already belonging to them. Keep in mind (those of you who currently have those imposed instruments of converted
rights) that just because you do have them in your possession, doesn’t mean or establish that you have knowingly or
willingly given up or waived any of your Unalienable Rights. Always sign any instruments placed before
you by agencies, or any Officers of the Corporate State of New Jersey (or any other States), with “all rights reserved”.
(See "How To Live Within Contracts” on the Open Readings Page). . Another dirty trick, initiated
by corporate thieves in seats of municipal governments is when they ask you: “Do you
waive your Right to Counsel?”
Do not fall for this deception. You may possibly assume that your are denying their court-appointed
attorney. When in reality, if you agree to “waive your right to counsel”, you have done just
that—waived your right. This is why they will not let any other person be your consul when you ‘present’
yourself “In Propria Persona”. Do not transfer or waive any rights, or give (leave) to any
'colorable' persons or entities present or not present in the 'Administrative Court'. . This deceptive offer, is designed to gain jurisdictional authority by oral agreement. It
is a jurisdictional contract offer, given under coercion and imposed duress. Never waive your right
to counsel (rightfully, Consul), and in fact, state for the record, your name and Nationality, and state that you do not,
did not, and do not intend to ever waive any of your secured rights to due process. , The valid venue of proper jurisdiction
must be secured by the Officers of the Court, upon your demand. .
As per the Constitution,
you have a pre-existing Right to Consul. Do not allow the judge or prosecutor (both being officers of the
Barrister’s Association), solicit from the bench, sales and offers from that conflict of interest, private club.
Do not allow these ‘colored’ persons decide who will be your consul / counsel. They
are already operating in a verifiable state of “conflict of Interest”. Do not let or trust them to tell you the
truth about their obligations, or to inform you that you have to have someone who is (allegedly) licensed to ‘practice’
law. The Congress does not, and the Constitution does not, license lawyers; because there is no such thing as a license to
practice law. The law (Constitution) is common to every free national being. There is
no political or religious test or requirement to have a ‘license’ in order to exercise, enjoy,
or to command the enforcement of the law (Constitution, Bill of Rights and Treaties). Do not believe me
- ask these administrative accusers to show you documented proof by Exhibit, their license to practice law. They,
in turn, will not; they cannot; and they do not; because such instruments do not exist. And this is the FACT. They (the Attorneys or other Officers of the
Court) may show you (under the rule of Discovery) a “Bar Association Membership Card” which they also are loath
to do. However that instrument is not a license, and is far from an alleged license. Such
instruments are private club—member, dues paying, agreements, which have nothing to do with Constitutional Obligations
(Articles III and VI) and are merely membership cards issued by private corporate interests, and officers of the Barristers
Association — a private and exclusive club. . . The responsibilities
to be active and to study do not end at this juncture. Peace! . About Dismissal Affidavits . The following Affidavits / Writs are for Ticket Dismissals and
present Law - Supports for Dismissal. The Natural Person is advised to submit the Affidavits
/ Writs to the Prosecutor and other court officers prior to the court date. In fact, most of the time, send your
Writs in by Certified Mail within 3 days after you receive the municipality's instruments. With proper correspondence,
you will, sometimes, receive a favorable reply, and won't have to come into the non- Article III court room. If
you are in a situation wherein you bring Writs with you, be sure to serve a copy to the Clerk for filing with the case. Some
clerks may try to tell you that they cannot receive your Writs, however, it is a violation of the Clerk's fudiciary
duties to deny the Writs of Evidence related to the case. Be sure to have the Ticket / Summons / Suit number(s) listed
at the top of your Writs / Affidavits, listing them and all other documented entries with numbers, such as, Exhibit 1; Exhibit
2; Exhibit 3, etc., etc. Remember, your Exhibits / Writs / Affidavits are instruments of Facts and when marked as Exhibits
it makes them a part of the "case", and the officers of the court are obliged to receive them, otherwise
they are tampering with evidence. . .. The reason they don't want to receive it, is because they are in fact obligated, and they would be responsible, and would
be compelled by law to respond. If you don't submit it, you would be irresponsible.
It is important to submit paperwork, as it becomes your exhibits, and is your paper trail (whether they accept,
or act on it or not). The paper trail is necessray, copying it to at least 3 different Persons / Corporations /
Agencies. In particular, the Clerk, the Judge of the said city / municipality / township, and a copy to the
State Attorney General's Office, as well as the State Secretary, as a minimum of three AND the Governor's Office, particularly
when dealing with so-named higher Courts such as Federal. This notifies other departments and makes it difficult
for all of them to ignore their fiduciary duties, and it sets up your paper trail for when you suit them, otherwise you have
no proof of their violations, or of your actions. If you put them on file at the court, make sure they stamp your copy
"received" with a date. .
1. Ticket Dismissal
.
2. Supreme Court Cases: Traffic & Ministerial Officerses
. .
To Top Of Page
To Home Page
|
